Molecular docking of some Triphenyltin (IV) aminobenzoate compounds as potential antiviral agents

 

Sutopo Hadi1*, Noviany Noviany1, Setyanto Tri Wahyudi2

1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences,

Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung 35145, Indonesia.

2Department of Physics, IPB University, Bogor, 16680,  Indonesia.

*Corresponding Author E-mail: sutopo.hadi@fmipa.unila.ac.id

 

ABSTRACT:

The triphenyltin (IV) hydroxide reaction by 2-, 3-, as well as 4-aminobenzoic acid was used to analyze the molecular docking of some triphenyltin (IV) aminobenzoate compounds in this research. These include; triphenyltin (IV) 2-aminobenzoate (2), triphenyltin (IV) 3-aminobenzoate (3) as well as triphenyltin (IV) 4-aminobenzoate (4) were well characterized by means of some spectroscopy techniques and microelemental analysis. The molecular docking was conducted on protein isolated from SARS-Cov-2 virus. The protein chosen was MPro and was docked toward the three compounds synthesized and compared with the commercial drug used for the treatment of virus, boceprevir. Based on the analysis of the energy binding calculation, the result revealed that the energy binding of the compounds 2-4 was -9.74; -9.97 and 10.42kcal/mol, respectively, while for boceprevir was -9.60kcal/mol. These results indicated that the three compounds were stronger as antivirus than the standard drug used, thus they are potentially used and developed as drugs in the treatment of virus SARS-Cov-2. 

 

KEYWORDS: Antivirus activity, Energy binding, Molecular docking, Triphenyltin(IV) aminobenzoate.

 

 


INTRODUCTION: 

Based on the World Health Organization (WHO), the Covid-19 was stated as pandemic in March 20201. The emergence and spread of this virus is one of the new public health crisis that threatens the world1-5. This is because of the fast spread of this virus all over the world1. As of July 18, 2022, based on data obtained from Worldometer, there were more than 567 million incidents with more than 6.37 million deaths spread across 224 countries6. Based on the data monitored from this page, the occurrence of the COVID-19 pandemic may not end in the near future. This happens because, so far there is no drug that can completely overcome this disease7-15, although the vaccination has proven to increase the body immune thus decreasing the possibility to get caught this virus.

 

Many studies have reported that chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine which are antimalarial drugs can be used for treating diseases generated byCOVID-197,8,10-15. Meanwhile, organotin(IV) carboxylate has also been found to have activity as both antimalarial and antiviral16-21, so research is needed to test whether organotin(IV) compounds can be used as metal-based materials that can be used for healing due to Covid-19.

 

Organotin(IV) compounds consists of several biological applications due to their strong influence even at very low concentration22-24. These compoundsbiological activities are dependent on the anion bearing and organic functional groups bound and attached to Sn22, as a complementary factor22,24. According to results from recent studies, some organotin(IV) carboxylates compounds exhibited advantageous activities as biological agents. These include antifungal23, antibacterial25-27, antitumor and anticancer28-30, corrosion inhibitor29,30, ntioxidant activities31.

 

Docking different types of ligands to the protein of interest followed by evaluating the score function is a very important aspect in the contex of drug discovery32-39. This technique is very useful to determine the binding affinity of the ligand to the protein and the strength of interaction between the two.

 

Several derivatives of organotin(IV) compound which are interesting to be tested are  triphenyltin (IV) aminobenzoates. The synthesis of these compounds has long been reported by some researchers40-45, however, no work has been reported so far on molecular docking with protein of SARS-Cov-2, therefore this study reports the molecular docking results of a protein selected from SARS-Cov-2 with several triphenyltin (IV) aminobenzoates.

 

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Materials:

The AR reagent obtained from popular suppliers was used to conduct this research. Triphenyltin(IV) hydroxide ((C6H5)3OH) (1), 2-, 3-, 4-aminobenzoic acids, boceprevir, as well as methanol (CH3OH) wereacquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Germany), biomol (Germany) and JT Baker company (United Kingdom). 

 

Characterization:

The UV spectra were produced from a Shimadzu UV-245 Spectrophotometer (Japan), by measuring the samples of 1.0x10-4 M dissolved in methanol with a 1 mL quartz-cuvette. Furthermore, the elemental analyzerwas manufactured by Carlo Erba (Fisons) EA 1108 CHNS-O. The chemical compositions (CHNS) of the samples were determined by the Elemental Analyser. KBr pellet procedure was used to characterize FTIR using Bruker VERTEX 70 FT-IR spectrophotometer (Germany) and the spectrums were obtained through scanning the sample in a 4000-400cm-1wavenumber. Bruker AV 600 MHz NMR spectrometer, manufactured in Germany at frequencies of 600 MHz for 1H as well as 150 MHz for 13C was used to collect NMR data consisting of 1H and 13C spectra. Measurements were carried out at 298K with DMSO-D6, using 32 scans for 1H as well as DMSO signal at 2.5 ppm as a reference as well as 1000-4000 scans for 13C at 39.5 ppm. Gallenkamp Melting Point Apparatus at 300°Cwas used to determine the meeting points.

 

The Preparation of Triphenyltin (IV) Aminobenzoates:

Triphenyltin (IV) aminobenzoates were prepared using the method applied in previous studies18-20,25-27. One of such methods includes dissolving compound 1 (0.5505g or 1.5mmol) in methanol (50mL) as well as mixing it with 1 mole equivalent of 2-aminobenzoic acid (0.206 g). This was continued by a 4 hour refluxing at a temperature of 60 – 62°C with the water removed utilizing a Dean-Stark apparatus. Subsequently, a rotary evaporation process was used to remove the solvent, and the solid [(C6H5)3Sn(2-OOCC6H4NH2] (2) yielded was vacuum dried. The solid obtained had a 0.671g mass that equals 92% yield. Furthermore, the samples were examined as well as employed to conduct a study on molecular docking.  

 

Triphenyltin(IV) 3-aminobenzoate, [(C6H5)3Sn(3-OOCC6H4NH2)] (3) and triphenyltin(IV) 4-aminobenzoate, [(C6H5)3Sn(4-OOCC6H4NH2)] (4) used similar technique implemented in the previous experimentation to synthesize a compound (2).

 

Triphenyltin(IV) 2-aminobenzoate (2): white-yellowish solid; UV lmax. (MeOH) nm (log e): 236 and 290;  IR nmax. (KBr) cm-1: 1633.4 (COO asym), 1428.7 (COO sym),; 729.4 (phen), 1243.4 (Sn-O-C), 365.6 (Sn-O); 1H-NMR (in DMSO-D6, 600 MHz) d (ppm): H2and H6= 7.59 (d, 6H); H3and H5= 7.48 (t, 6H); H4= 7.35 (t, 3H), H in benzoate = H10 = 7.84 (d) , H11=7.65 (t) and H12= 7.63 (t)H13 = 7.72 (d); 13C-NMR (in DMSO-D6, 150 MHz): d (ppm): C(phen) C2 and C6= 131.7, C3 and C5= 129.3 , C4= 126.9; C7: 166.7; C8: 139.5; C9 133.2; C10= 129.1; C11= 128.5; C12= 128.3; C13= 130.1; microelemental analysis: found : C 61.65 (61.73), H 4.29 (4.32), N 2.86 (2.88). M.p. 109-111°C (Literature values: 108-109°C41; 110-112°C42; 106-107°C43).

 

Triphenyltin(IV) 3-aminobenzoate (3): white solid; UV lmax. (MeOH) nm (log e): 236 and 289;  IR nmax. (KBr) cm-1: 1630.2 (COO asym), 1427.6 (COO sym),; 728.8 (phen), 1242.8 (Sn-O-C), 363.9 (Sn-O); 1H-NMR (in DMSO-D6, 600 MHz) d (ppm): H2= H6 7.59 (d, 6H); H3and H5 7.46 (t, 6H); H4: 7.33 (t, 3H), H in benzoate: H9= 7.83 (s); H11=7.60 (d); H12= 7.60 (d); H13 = 7.60 (d); 13C-NMR (in DMSO-D6, 150 MHz): d (ppm): C(phen) C2 and C6= 131.7, C3 and C5= 129.2, C4= 126.9; C7= 165.3; C8= 137.2; C9 = 132.9; C10 = 129.5; C11= 128.4; C12=128.2; C13= 130.0; microelemental analysis: found : C 61.67 (61.73), H 4.29 (4.32), N 2.87 (2.88). M.p. 105-106°C (Literature value: 105°43).

 

Triphenyltin(IV) 4-aminobenzoate (4): white solid; UV lmax. (MeOH) nm (log e): 236 and 286; IR nmax. (KBr) cm-1: 1629.8 (COO asym); 1426.5 (COO sym); 727.6 (phen), 1241.3 (Sn-O-C), 362.8 (Sn-O); 1H-NMR (in DMSO-D6, 600 MHz) d (ppm): H2and H6 7.57 (d, 6H); H3and H5 7.45 (t, 6H); H4: 7.32 (t, 3H), H in benzoate: H9and H13 = 7.78 (d) , H10and H12= 7.80 (d); 13C-NMR (in DMSO-D6, 150 MHz): d (ppm): C(phen) C2 and C6= 131.6, C3 and C5= 129.1, C4= 126.9; C7= 163.8; C8= 137.0; C9 and C13= 130.2; C10 and C12= 129.1; C11: 129.5; microelemental analysis: found: C 61.69 (61.73), H 4.31 (4.32), N 2.88 (2.88). M.p. 157-158°C (Literature values: 158-159°C41; 156-157°C43).

 

Molecular Docking Activity Study:

The hardware used was an Acer Laptops with Intel® Celeron® processors 2955U 1.4 GHz with 2MB L3 cache, two gigabytes of RAM (Random Access Memory), with the Original Windows 7 Operating System. AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina software were used for all calculation of the addition of molecules and scores. The compounds extracted from database PubChem were converted to SDF format, combined in a file and then imported into Auto Dock. Furthermore, the atomic coordinates of the crystal structure in the Mpro protein were extracted on the PDB (Protein Data Bank) as well as made through extracting all solvents with the addition of hydrogen and minimization of ligands bound using the Protein Preparation Wizard. Ionizers were used to produce the ionized state of all compounds on the pH 7 target. Conformer these made low-energy ligands were taken as input for induced addition of molecules. The molecular addition protocol induced-fit incrementally using the AutoDock 4 and device Auto Dock Vina. The results of each device are used to provide rank on the target compound based on its predicted binding energy. The capabilities of AutoDock 4 and AutoDock Vina were preferentially evaluated to determine the active compound classified by the DSF and conformation consistent32-39.

 

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION:

Three triphenyltin(IV) aminobenzoates, compounds 2, 3, as well as 4, shown in Figure 1,were synthesized through reacting [(C6H5)3SnOH] (1) using 2-, 3-, 4-aminobenzoic acids, with the directions contained on the preliminary studies18-20, 25-27. The synthesized compounds' elemental microanalyses were in line with the estimated data.

 

Fig. 1: The compounds studied structure

 

Some spectroscopic strategies were utilized to determine thecompounds identity. A 726.36 cm-1wave number was used to characterize the compound 1 FT-IR spectrum which indicates the existence of the Sn–O bond. In the 3437.29 cm-1wave number, this band was given to the Sn-OH bond and with [(C6H5)3Sn(2-OOCC6H4NH2] formation (2), the hydroxyl stretching vibration lose. Furthermore, intense bands were obtained from asymmetric and the carboxylate symmetric stretching at 1530 cm-1 as well as 1634 cm-1. This showed that the aminobenzoate ligand istied to the Sn centre as well as substituted OH- group at compound 1. This extension is due to the absorption band at 1240 cm-1, that connected with Sn-O-C stretching. The absorption bands examined in FTIR spectrum showed theformation ofcompounds 23,as well as 418-20, 25-27.

 

Some important signals were used to synthesize the 1H and 13C NMR spectra for the compounds. Furthermore, the presence of phenyl protons bound to central atom Sn and benzoate are due to the chemical shifts in 7.30 – 7.59 ppm and 7.6 – 7.9ppm. Signals in the range of 131 – 126 ppm and 140 – 130ppm, representing carbon atoms of the phenyl ligand, and aminobenzoate were found on the NMR spectra. These values are in accordance with preliminary studies and the additional support is given through the signals within the 163 166ppm region, thereby signifying the presence of carboxyl group18-20,25-27, 46. The chemical shifts generated from the compound are in accordance with the data for the compounds formerly analysed18-20, 25-27, 46.

 

The results in Table 1 indicate that the synthesized triphenyltin (IV) aminobenzoates showed smaller energy binding than the drug standard used. Thus it is an indication that the three compounds docked with MPro protein were more active as antivirus drug. Their strong activity against antivirus was also supported their very low of estimation of inhibition constant (Ki) which were 7.2 x 10-2, 5.0 x 10-2, as well as 2.3 x 10-2‑µM47, 48. An example of docking interaction between compound 4 and MPro protein is shown in Figure 2.

 

Fig. 2: The interaction of triphenyltin(IV) 4-aminobenzoate with MPro protein isolated from SARS-Cov-2

 

The experimental results obtained showed that both the carbon atom number and the ligand type play essential roles in performance of triphenyltin(IV) compounds investigated as an anti-malaria agent49. These results are in line with the features of numerous biologically active compounds, whereby the complex ones are higher than the non-complex forms50.

 

Table1: The energy binding and estimation of inhibition constant (Ki) of the compounds investigated

Compounds

Energy binding (Kcal.mol)

Estimation of inhibition constant (Ki) x 10-2 µM

Boceprevir

-9.60

9.5

2-aminobenzoic acid

(2-(NH2)C6H4COOH)

-1.22

22

[(C6H5)3SnOH] (1)

-2.51

19

[(C6H5)3Sn(2-OOCC6H4NH2] (2)

-9.74

7.2

[(C6H5)3Sn(3-OOCC6H4NH2] (3)

-9.97

5.0

[(C6H5)3Sn(4-OOCC6H4NH2] (4)

-10.42

2.3

 

CONCLUSIONS:

In conclusion, this research successfully prepared three triphenyltin(IV) aminobenzoate compounds, and the molecular docking has been successfully conducted against a protein isolated from SARS-Cov-2 virus. The result of energy binding clearly indicated that the compounds synthesized were more active and stronger than the positive control drug used in the testing. The results were also supported with the low estimation of inhibition constants of compounds 2-4. It is suggested to evaluate further a molecular docking on other proteins from SARS-Cov-2 such as RdRp as well as Plpro to see their potential used as antivirus agent.

 

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS:

The authors expresses gratitude to the Research and Community Services Directorate, and Education, Cultural, Research, and Technology Ministry for funding this research through Penelitian Terapan 2021, with the contract of 3973/UN26.21/PN/2021 and 276/E4.1/AK.04.PT/2021 and National Competitive Basic Research Grant Scheme (Penelitian Dasar Kompetitive Nasional) with contract numbers of 027/E5/PG.02.00/PT/2022, dated March 16, 2022 and 2143/UN26.21/PN/2022 dated April 29, 2022.

 

CONFLICT OF INTEREST:

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

 

REFERENCES:

1.     WHO (World Health Organization). WHO announces COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic, 2020. https://www.euro.who.int/en/health-topics/health-emergencies/coronavirus-covid-19/news/news/2020/3/who-announces-covid-19-outbreak-a-pandemic. (Accessed on November 10, 2021)

2.     Singhal T. A Review of Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19). Indian Journal of Pediatrics. 2020; 87(4): 281-6.doi: 10.1007/s12098-020-03263-6

3.     Mor S, Saini P, Wangnoo SK, Bawa T. Worldwide spread of COVID-19 Pandemic and risk factors among Co-morbid conditions especially Diabetes Mellitus in India. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(5):2530-2532. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00450.3

4.     Menon S, Bhagat V. Review of the impact Covid-19 has on the Psychosocial factors affecting Well-Being. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(6):3404-3408. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00592

5.     Menon S, Bhagat V. A Review Study on the impact of COVID-19 on Mental Health in the workplace and on working people. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(12):6725-1. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.01162

6.     https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/ (Accessed on July 18, 2022)

7.     Baildya N, Ghosh NN, Chattopadhyay AP. Inhibitory activity of hydroxychloroquine on COVID-19 main protease: An insight from MD-simulation studies. Journal of Molecular Structure. 2020 5; 1219: 128595.doi: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2020.128595

8.     Yang A, Yang C, Yang B. Use of hydroxychloroquine and interferon alpha-2b for the prophylaxis of COVID-19. Medical Hypotheses. 2020; 144: 109802.

9.     Hedenstierna G, Chen L, Hedenstierna M, Lieberman R, Fine DH. Nitric oxide dosed in short bursts at high concentrations may protect against Covid 19. Nitric Oxide - Biology and Chemistry. 2020; 103: 1-3

10.   Colson P, Rolain JM, Lagier JC, Brouqui P, Raoult D. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-19. International Journalof Antimicrobial Agents. 2020; 55(4): 105932.doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105932.

11.   Keyaerts E, Li S, Vijgen L, Rysman E, Verbeeck J, Rants MV, Maes P. Antiviral activity of chloroquine against human coronavirus OC43 infection in newborn mice. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2009; 53 (8): 3416-3421.doi: 10.1128/AAC.01509-08

12.   Vincent MJ, Bergeron E, Benjannet S, Erickson BR, Rollin PE, Ksiazek TG,Seidah NG, Nichol ST. Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread. Virology Journal. 2005; 22(2): 69.doi: 10.1186/1743-422X-2-69

13.   Savarino A, Boelaert JR, Cassone A, Majori G, Cauda R. Effects of chloroquine on viral infections: an old drug against today's diseases?. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 2003; 3(11): 722-7.doi: 10.1016/s1473-3099(03)00806-5

14.   DevauxCA, Rolain JM, Colson P, Raoult D. New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: what to expect for COVID-19?.International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. 2020 May;55(5): 105938.doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.105938

15.   Wang M, Cao R, Zhang L, Yang X, Liu J, Xu M, Shi Z, Hu Z, Zhong W, Xiao G. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Research. 2020; 30(3): 269-71.doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0282-0

16.   Shah FA, Sabir S, Fatima K, Ali S, Qadri I, Rizzoli C. Organotin(IV) based anti-HCV drugs: Synthesis, characterization and biochemical activity. Dalton Transactions. 2015; 44(22): 10467-78. doi: 10.1039/C5DT00862J

17.   Shah FA, Fatima K, Ali S, Qadri I. Design, synthesis, and delivery studies of organotin(IV) based HCV inhibitor. Infectious Disorders-Drug Targets. 2015; 15(3): 153-62. doi: 10.2174/1871526515666150903121956

18.   Hadi S, Noviany, Qudus HI, Wattana-Amorn P. The Potency Study of Organotin (IV) 3-Nitrobenzoate Compounds as Antimalarial Agents. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019; 1338: 012012. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1338/1/012012

19.   Hadi S, Fenska MD, Noviany N, Satria H, Simanjuntak W, Naseer MM. Synthesis and Antimalarial Activity of Some Triphenyltin(IV) Aminobenzoate Compounds against Plasmodium falciparum. Main Metal Group Chemistry. 2021; 44(1): 256-60. doi: 10.1515/mgmc-2021-0028

20.   Hadi S, Noviany N, Rilyanti M. In Vitro Antimalarial Activity of Some Organotin(IV) 2-Nitrobenzoate Compounds Against Plasmodium falciparum. Macedonian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering. 2018; 37(2): 185-91. doi: 10.20450/mjcce.2018.1414

21.   Hansch C,Verma RP. Larvicidal activities of some organotin compounds onmosquito larvae: A QSAR study. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2009; 44(1): 260-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2008.02.040

22.   Tiekink ERT. Structural Chemistry of Organotin Carboxylates: a Review of the Crystallographic Literature. Applied Organometallic Chemistry. 1991; 5(1): 1-23.doi: 10.1002/aoc.590050102

23.   Szorcsik A, Nagy L, Gadja-Schrantz K, Pellerito L, Nagy E,Edelmann ET. Structural studies on organotin(IV) complexes formed with ligands containing {S, N, O} donor atoms, Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2002; 252 (3): 523-30.doi:10.1023/A:1015802820423

24.   Pellerito L, Nagy L. Organotin(IV)n+ complexes formed with biologically active ligands: equilibrium and structural studies, and some biological aspects. Coordination Chemistry Review. 2002; 224(1-2): 111-50.doi: 10.1016/S0010-8545(01)00399-X

25.   Annissa, Suhartati T, Yandri, Hadi S., Antibacterial Activity of Diphenyltin(IV) and Triphenyltin(IV) 3-Chlorobenzoate against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Bacillus subtilis. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2017; 33(3): 1133-9.doi: 10.13005/ojc/330310

26.   Hadi S, Hermawati E, Noviany, Suhartati T, Yandri. Antibacterial Activity Test of Diphenyltin(IV) Benzoate Compound against Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Asian Journal of Microbiology, Biotechnology and Environmental Sciences. 2018; 20(1): 113-9.

27.   Hadi S, Lestari S, Suhartati T,Qudus HI, Rilyanti M, Herasari D, Yandri Y. Synthesis and comparative study on the antibacterial activity organotin (IV) 3-hydroxybenzoate compounds. Pure and Appllied Chemistry. 2021; 93(5): 623-8. doi: 10.1515/pac-2020-1103

28.   Rehman W, Badshah A, Khan S, Tuyet LTA. Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial and Antitumor Screening of Some Diorganotin(IV) Complexes of 2-[(9H-Purin-6-ylimino)]-phenol. European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 2009; 44(10): 3981–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2009.04.027

29.   Hadi S., Rilyanti M. Synthesis and in vitro anticancer activity of some organotin(IV) benzoate compounds. Oriental Journal of Chemistry. 2010; 26(3): 775-9.

30.   Hadi S, Rilyanti M, Suharso. In Vitro Activity and Comparative Studies of Some Organotin(IV) Benzoate Derivatives Against Leukemia Cancer Cell: L-1210. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry. 2012; 12(2): 172-7. doi: 10.22146/ijc.21359

31.   Sari W, Qudus HI, Hadi S. The Chemical Reactivity Study of Organotin(IV) 4-aminobenzoates Using Cyclic Voltammetry and Antioxidant Activity Test by the DPPH Method. Revista deChimie. 2020 ; 71(10): 28-37.doi: 10.37358/RC.20.10.8347

32.   Safiya sultana T, Umamaheswari S, Sivakumar M, Umar Khan S. De Novo In-silico Pharmacological Analysis of Herbal Phytoconstituents for COVID-19 Treatment. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(1):257-2. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00042

33.   Redhwan MAM, Deka G, Varghese MM. Synthesis and Molecular docking studies of some new Pyrazoline derivatives for Antimicrobial properties. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(10): 4629-4634. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00815.X

34.   Ramachandran S, Vimeshya N, Yokeshwaran K, Cheriyan BV, Aanandhi MV. Molecular Docking Studies as Antidepressant Agents, Synthetic Techniques, Antimicrobial Screening of Azetidine-2-One Derivatives- A Review. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(11): 5524-5528. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.00964.6

35.   Rao S, Bhat V, Fathima F, Kumar S, Verma R. In-silico studies of Novel triazole derivatives as inhibitor of 14α demethylase CYP51. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2020; 13(12): 5806-10. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2020.01012.4

36.   Singh R, Pani Prasad K, Tiwari A, Pathak A, Srivastava P. Molecular docking and Simulation study to identify Antiviral agent by targeting MX protein against Betanodavirus causing viral nervous necrosis in Barramundi. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(3): 1405-11. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2021.00251.1

37.   Panchabhai VB, Butle SR, Ingole PG. Synthesis, characterization and molecular docking studies on some new N-substituted 2-phenylpyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine derivatives. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(7): 3846-4. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00667

38.   Kumar V, Kancharla S, Jena MK. In silico screening of FDA approved drugs predicts the therapeutic potentials of Antibiotic drugs against the papain like protease of SARS-CoV-2. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2021; 14(8): 4035-9. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2021.00699

39.   Prachi Parvatikar, Bhaskar Saha, Sayandeep K. Das, R. Chandramouli Reddy, ShrilaxmiBagali, Raghavendra V. Kulkarni, Aravind V. Patil, Mallanagoud S. Biradar, Kusal K. Das. Molecular Docking Identifies Novel Phytochemical Inhibitors Against SARS-COV-2 for Covid-19 Therapy. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2022; 15(2): 555-8. doi: 10.52711/0974-360X.2022.00090

40.   Holec̆ek J, Handlír̆ K, Nádvorník M, Lyc̆ka A. 13C and Sn NMR study of some triphenyltin(IV) carboxylates. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1983; 258(2): 147-53. doi:10.1016/S0022-328X(00)99251-9

41.   Khoo LE, Smith FE. NMR Studies of Triorganotin Aminobenzoates. InorganicaChimica Acta. 1981; 53: L83-4. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1693(00)84749-0

42.   Molloy K.C., Blunden S.J., Hill R., Organotin biocides. Part 11. Triphenyltin benzoates: electronic versus steric control of structure. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans.: Inorg. Chem. 1988; 5: 1259-1266.

43.   Sandhu GK, Verma SP, Moore LS, Parish RV. Triorganotin(IV) benzoates and aminobenzoates. Journal of Organometallic Chemistry. 1987; 321(1): 15-25.

44.   Swisher RG, Volcano JF, Chandrasekhar V, Day RO, Holmes RR. Pentacoordinated Structures of Triphenyltin Esters of Anthranilic Acid.; o-(Dimethylamino)benzoic Acid, and p-Aminobenzoic Acid Formed by Intramolecular Carboxylate Group Coordination1,2. Inorganic Chemistry. 1984; 23: 3147-52.

45.   Tzimopoulos D, Gdaniec M, Bakas T, Akrivos PD. Structural elucidation for triorganotin derivatives of 3-amino, 4-amino and 3,5-diaminobenzoate. Crystal structures of triphenyltin 4-aminobenzoate and trimethyl and triphenyltin 3,5-diaminobenzoate. Journal of Coordination Chemistry, 2009; 62: 1218–1231.

46.   Samsuar S, Simanjuntak W, Qudus HI, Yandri T,Herasari D, Hadi S. In Vitro Antimicrobial Activity Study of Some Organotin (IV) Chlorobenzoates against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli. Journal of Advanced Pharmacy and Education Research. 2021; 11(2): 17‒22. doi: 10.51847/kaijZKAFCO

47.   Chang MW, Ayeni C, Breuer S, Torbett BE. Virtual screening for HIV protease inhibitors: a comparison of AutoDock 4 and Vina. PloSone. 2010; 5(8): e11955.doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011955

48.   Seri J, Suwon K, Dong HS, Mi-Sun K. Inhibition of SARSCoV3CL protease by flavonoids. Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal Chemistry. 2020; 35(1): 145-51. doi: 10.1080/14756366.2019.1690480

49.   Chohan ZH, Rauf A. Some Biologically Active Mixed Ligand Complexes of Co(II), Cu(II) and Ni(II) with ONO, NNO and SNO Donor Nicotinoylhydrazine-Derived Ligands. Synthesis and Reactivity in Inorganic and Metal-Organic Chemistry. 1996; 26: 591-604.doi:10.1080/00945719608004764

50.   Gershon H. Antifungal Activity of Bischelates of 5-, 7-, and 5,7-halogenated 8-quinols with copper(II). Determination of the long and short acces of the pores in the fungal spore wall. Journal of Medical Chemistry. 1974; 17(8): 824-7.doi: 10.1021/jm00254a009

 

 

 

 

Received on 09.08.2022           Modified on 31.12.2022

Accepted on 23.05.2023          © RJPT All right reserved

Research J. Pharm. and Tech 2023; 16(9):4032-4036.

DOI: 10.52711/0974-360X.2023.00661